Sunday, November 23, 2025

A Suitable Match, a new Basil Rosa story featured in The Bloomin' Onion


           Too cruel is life to those aged beyond their years.



A sincere and humble thank you to editors Daniel Groves, and Leah Harter at The Bloomin' Onion for featuring my Basil Rosa story, A Suitable Match, in the November 15th, 2025 issue of their magazine.

Here is a direct link: https://www.thebloominonion.com/featured-story-4

And here's a link to the The Bloomin' Onion home page: https://www.thebloominonion.com/short-stories-home

Lastly, to provide a taste, here is the story's opening paragraph:

A Suitable Match

by Basil Rosa

Cruelty and the teen experience are often synonymous, and Najam’s harelip and long hooked nose made him an easy target. I didn’t know if he was devout, nor did I doubt he felt like an outsider. When I asked my daughter Georgina about him, she replied with a note of defensive incivility, sounding a lot like Clare, her mother, that organized religion was never what anybody’s God had in mind. I could no longer make Georgina attend mass or pray for Najam. Neither could Clare. Accepting limitations is one of those difficult lessons each parent learns.

Wednesday, November 5, 2025

The Uroboros Mirror, a new Basil Rosa story published in The Bloomin' Onion

 


A new Basil Rosa story, The Uroboros Mirror, is now available in Issue Number Two of the online magazine, The Bloomin' Onion. Many thanks to Editor-in-Chief, Daniel Groves.

https://www.thebloominonion.com/the-ouroboros-mirror-issue-two

Here, to wet your whistle, is the first paragraph:


The Uroboros Mirror

Basil Rosa

In the 1980s, while wearing red leather pants, it hit me—I was a girl in a man’s body. Bopping about, my hair spiked and dyed peacock blue, a ring in one nostril, I wanted to be Cindy Lauper. I kept my Sony Walkman and earbuds on, determined never to conform or lose the humor and optimism my favorites songs delivered, though I vacillated between “Cruel Summer” by Bananarama, and Funboy Three’s “The Lunatics Are Taking Over The Asylum.”

Here is a link to main page of The Bloomin' Onion:  https://www.thebloominonion.com/



Sunday, October 26, 2025

Blurring The Line, a new story from John Michael Flynn published in Penelle



A big thank you to editors Kameron Ray Morton, and Oscar Matallana Correa for publishing my short story, Blurring The Line, in the inaugural issue of Penelle magazine. 


Kameron hails from Arkansas, and Oscar from Bogota, Columbia. I'm tickled and grateful to have a story accepted by editors from such different backgrounds. I hope their interest speaks to universal elements in the work.

Here is a link to the Penelle home page: https://penellemagazine.com/2025/10/22/issue-1/  

Here is a link directly to the story: https://penellemagazine.com/2025/10/22/blurring-the-line/


                                                                      



Wednesday, September 17, 2025

"IF I CAN'T LAUGH I DON'T WANT TO BE IN YOUR REVOLUTION" -- MARC ESTRIN, A MEMORIAL TRIBUTE

 



From the Greek manthanein meaning “to learn,” and poly, of course, meaning “much” or “many,” it’s an understatement to claim that Marc Estrin was a polymath. Marc labored tirelessly as an editor, a musician, a composer, an author, a publisher, an artist with the Bread And Puppet Theatre, and a political activist. He wrote 17 novels and two memoirs and died at age 86 on the tenth of August, 2025. 

According to what I’ve researched from Shelf Awareness, and Seven Days (the links are below this paragraph) Mark and his wife, Donna Bister, creators of Fomite Press, https://fomitepress.com/ were in their fourteenth year of running what they called their postcapitalist publishing company. Or, more specifically and playfully, what Marc in his canny way called "Occupy publishing."

https://www.sevendaysvt.com/life-lines/obituary-marc-estrin-1939-2025-44262778

https://www.sevendaysvt.com/arts-culture/author-and-activist-marc-estrin-dies-at-86-44208501

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Estrin

https://breadandpuppetpress.org/collections/fomite-press

Before this venture into book publishing, the couple, along with fellow Vermonter, author and activist Ron Jacobs https://www.counterpunch.org/author/ron-jacobs/ spent close to seven years producing the Old North End Rag, a monthly neighborhood newspaper they started in 1996 as a way to distribute the Burlington Vermont’s Neighborhood Planning Assembly's agenda. They used cartoons and articles to attract interest. A fabricated story in an April Fools' issue announced that Burlington’s City Market was going to start selling cigarettes. This allegedly prompted a call from the city's Community & Economic Development Office.

Author Ron Jacobs

Published in CounterPunch magazine on August 13th just two days after his death, Mr. Jacobs wrote a tribute titled, “Marc Estrin's Fictions of Alienation” https://www.counterpunch.org/2025/08/13/marc-estrins-fictions-of-alienation/ that summarizes Marc’s work, and reveals something of the man. 

Jacobs wrote: "I don’t want to make Marc sound too serious because he wasn’t. Consciously or not, he reminded me of the trickster more than once. While our work may have been serious, his approach reminded me of a quote attributed to Emma Goldman about dancing and revolution. I never saw Marc dance, so this seems like a more honest paraphrase: 'If I can’t laugh, I don’t want to be in your revolution.' "

I savor viewing Marc’s work this way, as the ongoing testimony of a literary trickster. Jacobs is quoted in a Seven Days interview that "I will write a tribute to him once I gather my thoughts. I'll miss him as a friend, editor and co-conspirator." 

I like that label, as well – co-conspirator. I look forward to Mr. Jacobs next tribute.

To learn more about Marc, and some of the ideas and motivations behind his work, by all means visit his website, https://marcestrin.com/

It’s full of oddities such as Marc, explaining The Insect Dialogues, one of his nonfiction books, but writing of himself in the third person: 

"In 2016, Marc Estrin decided to publish Kafka's Roach, the unedited version of the manuscript that a dozen years earlier Fred Ramey had acquired, edited, and published under the title Insect Dreams: The Half Life of Gregor Samsa. Estrin's decision raises questions about the editor's role in the life of a book, the trajectory of one author's career, and whether a published novel is a stable thing anymore. All of that is worth a wide discussion, and so Ramey asked his erstwhile author to engage in a colloquy. The Insect Dialogues is the record of the e-mail conversation that ensued."

Published in 2002, Marc’s novel Insect Dreams, The Half Life of Gregor Samsa riffs on Kafka’s character in his classic story, “The Metamorphosis.” 

In a review for the New York Times, Ken Tucker wrote: "Estrin plucks the bug, which was tossed into the trash at the conclusion of Kafka's tale, and lets him live on in a book that is a sort of ‘Ragtime’ for roaches," adding that Marc "has music in his prose." 

As co-publisher of Unbridled Books, Fred Ramey has stated in an interview, recalling their exchange and editorial relationship: "It's been about 25 years, since I published Marc's debut novel at BlueHen/Putnam. (I published it a second time at Unbridled Books.) In all, I published, I think, six of his first seven novels. Marc was prolific and irrepressible, but he was not in any way uneditable. On the contrary. What he wrote was always brave and imaginative and unexpected. After he and Donna founded Fomite Press, he would often encourage my work as he did for so many people. I think that was an extension of his activism. After 25 years of our exchanges, I imagine I'll keep wondering about all the books Marc didn't get to write."

Each of Marc's books is so different. So off the wall. Such a mash-up and, in my opinion, refreshingly experimental and daring. And much different from my own, to be sure. He was prolific, but I don’t think he was all that keen on penning conventional realistic fiction, or living a conventional life, but he appeared to like and enjoy reading, editing and supporting authors of all stripes. A quick survey of some of his titles makes it apparent that he approached fiction and nonfiction as needing as much quirkiness, intellectualism and post-post-modern humor and surrealism that any author could dream up. 



In 2005, Marc published The Education of Arnold Hitler. If that’s not a tongue-in-cheek title, I don’t know what is. 


Other novels include, Golem Song in 2006, The Lamentations of Julius Marantz in 2007, The Annotated Nose, with artwork by Delia Robinson in 2008, Skulk in 2009, followed by The Good Doctor Guillotin in the same year. 



In 2011, he published When the Gods Come Home to Roost. And Kafka's Roach in 2017.

Ron Jacobs has also described Marc as a "modern-day Renaissance man." Marc enjoyed, wrote about, played and studied music. He was a theater director in San Francisco, and Pittsburgh. He was a theater professor at the now-closed Goddard College in Plainfield, Vermont. He was an ordained Unitarian Universalist minister who served congregations in Moscow, Idaho, and in Middlebury, Vermont. He was a physician's assistant, a cellist, a puppeteer who toured with Bread and Puppet Theater, and the first coordinator of the Burlington Peace & Justice Center.



Burlington City Councilor Gene Bergman, a friend of Marc’s who worked with him in the fight for peace and justice, said when interviewed for Seven Days that Marc had “a philosopher's sensibility” and was an “intellectual in the truest sense of the word." 

Wendy Coe, Gene Bergman’s wife who co-founded the Peace & Justice Center where Estrin was hired in 1984 making him its first paid employee, told Seven Days that while Estrin could be curmudgeonly at times, he was positive and always thinking about ways to change the world. "He did enough thinking for a thousand people."

I liked learning that Marc could be curmudgeonly at times. Curmudgeons are seldom dull. I’m sure that some nagging dissatisfactions were part of what drove him. Marc, however, never took himself too seriously. https://marcestrin.blogspot.com/


He's pictured above playing in Warsaw in 1972. 

The About the author section on the home page of his website proves Marc's ability to laugh at himself with self-deprecating nuggets such as: 

"He is baffling, even unto himself."

OR

“Marc Estrin is a writer, cellist, and activist living in Burlington, Vermont.”

OR

“Marc Estrin's world line approximates a cross between a fungal mycelium and a Rube Goldberg device. Biologist, theater director, EMT, Unitarian minister, physician assistant, puppeteer, political activist, college professor, cellist and conductor, he is baffling, even unto himself.”

OR

“Marc Estrin was hired to teach theater at Goddard College, but in this departmentless utopia, wound up also teaching music, writing, Finnegans Wake, math, physics, medical self-help and "crazy courses" like Philosophy for Dishwashers, an audio-based lecture/discussion series to sweeten the life of cafeteria volunteers. Such are the fruits of liberal education.”

OR

“Marc Estrin grew up in a small apartment so full of books you had to walk sideways in the hall. Of these, he read not one -- till age sixteen, when he gave up his literary virginity to Franz Kafka: The Trial was his introduction to the larger life. This explains much. A mediocre student in high school, he was teased by his father into reading The Magic Mountain during the summer before college. Epiphany! The book was for him a topo-map of western thought and culture. With Mann as his guide, he sailed through college and grad schools, making a Hegelian leap out of graduate science into the richer, if iffier area of the arts. The Vietnam war and Bertolt Brecht were his siren callers into political activity, and his professional theater work dissipated into organizing, college teaching and communal living. When these ceased to put food on the table, he reached back into a past life to study and practice medicine. With the computer came the possibility of writing without retyping -- a stimulus sufficient to have resulted in his current crop of manuscripts, published and unpublished.”


This is from Elisabeth Crean’s review of Marc’s The Good Doctor Guillotin: An Anatomy of Five, published by Unbridled Books. https://www.unbridledbooks.com/


Unusual elements often fuse in the alchemy that inspires a work of fiction. Burlington writer and activist Marc Estrin cites two catalysts for his latest project, The Good Doctor Guillotin: An Anatomy of Five, that seem completely unrelated: an interest in the case of the Vermonter sent to death row, and the desire to read a popular tome about the French Revolution. Capital punishment is the topic that linked them. Although many heads ultimately rolled during France’s years of political disarray, leaders hotly debated the morality of state-sponsored execution in the revolt’s idealistic early days, just as Americans do today.

Most of The Good Doctor Guillotin is a historical novel, set in the tumultuous years just before and at the dawn of the Revolution. Estrin traces how the lives of five characters intersect at a gruesome hour on April 25, 1792: the first execution by the newly unveiled guillotine. Brief nonfiction essays, in which Estrin opines on past and present political topics, introduce each series of chapters.

“The initial inspiration was the work that I’m doing with Vermonters Against the Death Penalty, which started with the Donnie Fell case a couple of years ago,” Estrin recalls. (Federal prosecutors successfully secured a capital sentence against Fell in 2006 for taking a Rutland murder victim across state lines in 2000.) Book projects often become the “focus for research and reading that I’ve been wanting to do for a while,” Estrin confesses. He’d been “looking for an excuse to read” Simon Schama’s Citizens, a sprawling history of France’s first flirtation with democracy.

This began a six-month path of research. Four of the novel’s five principals are real historical people. “There wasn’t much about anybody,” Estrin explains. “So I had to make up a lot of stuff” to flesh out skeletal biographical materials. The characters feel authentic because they inhabit a world thoroughly grounded in period detail. They also interact with other historical figures about whom more is known, such as Mozart, Robespierre and the Marquis de Sade.

The novelist creates a rich inner life for each character. Most compelling is that of the doctor, who is also a political reformer and ardent opponent of capital punishment. He doesn’t think enough fellow National Assembly delegates can be persuaded to abolish the death penalty, so he proposes creating a swifter and supposedly less painful method than those used at the time: a mechanical decapitation device.

Guillotin doesn’t invent the tall wooden frame with the efficient triangular blade — it is based on Scottish and Italian designs already in use. Nor does he build it; a German piano maker living in Paris does. But, as Estrin writes, “the good Doctor Guillotin [is] a man doomed by laughing fate to immortal scorn. He wanted an egalitarian justice system, a more humane method of execution. In return he was haunted by repulsion and sniggering, by dirty pointing fingers and hands going chop-chop at the neck.” Guillotine is a feminine noun that implies the death machine is the humanitarian’s daughter.

Capital punishment wasn’t outlawed in France until 1981. The last execution took place in Marseille, in 1977. The method? The only one used in that country since the French Revolution: guillotine.



Fomite also published approximately 20 books with the Bread and Puppet theater company. 



Donna and Marc worked with painter and sculptor Delia Robinson to illustrate some Fomite books. Ms. Robinson had known Marc since the age of 16, adding to a sense of family that I came to believe was part of Fomite’s mission. "He really was a person of integrity in many astonishing ways,” said Ms. Robinson in an interview with Seven Days. “And that included helping other people to try to learn, to jump a little higher and to discover the best things they could do."


Ms. Robinson appears as a character in Mark’s novel, The Annotated Nose, published by Unbridled Books. The daughter of a Princeton professor, Ms. Robinson grew up next door to Albert Einstein. She knew Vermont poet Galway Kinnell, once her father’s student, “since before I was an egg.” Raised at a time when women weren’t expected to produce art, she trained as a nurse to pay for her paints.

“I can’t paint on a clean surface,” she told Margot Harrison in an interview. “If a piece of paper’s been run over by a truck, that interests me a lot. I have to mess a piece of paper up. And generally I do that with photo transfers. I put down a lot of mess on a page of newsprint, anything, and I glue it facedown on the page, and then I rip it all off and scrub it off. When it looks like a skin disease, I’m very happy. And then I draw on top or paint on top of that.”

The result is multilayered images that combine painting with photomontage. For instance, in Robinson’s illustration of Alexei Pigov’s “first love,” photos of the New York skyline are dimly visible through the young girl’s translucent image. “I really like that kind of thing, where you can see through to what’s hidden underneath,” Robinson says. “I’m very interested in what’s not immediately appparent. What’s behind the behind the behind.”

Ms. Robinson works mostly in acrylic: “I’m way too impatient to wait for oil to dry,” she says. “I also use a lot of materials you shouldn’t use — kids’ crayons, anything. I like staples stuck into things. I like a big mess. It’s a thick, linoleum-like surface.”

Not unlike Marc’s novels, with their dense collage of high and low cultural references. “My paintings all have these layers. And his books are built in the same kind of way.” 

Ms. Robinson goes on to say that illustrating The Annotated Nose “was major for me, because it’s the first glimpse I’ve had of the fact that I am not totally, rebelliously independent. I can do a picture on someone else’s theme and not find that an excruciating or diminishing idea.”

Here is Margot Harrison’s 2008 review of The Annotated Nose

One spring, Burlington author Marc Estrin attends an unusual midnight gathering at the Flynn Center. The sold-out event attracts a crowd of young people dressed as “zombies, ghouls, vamps and vampires,” not to mention the “plague doctors” — “a large flock of black-gowned, bird-masked figures with yard-long beaks and goggled eyes.” They’re all here to see a mysterious masked figure called The Nose, who bounds onstage leading a rat on a leash and addresses them as “Dearly Afflicted.”

As The Nose informs the audience that he’s here to deliver them from the “contemporary plague,” a mystified Estrin asks his daughter what’s going on. She explains that the performance is based on a bestselling book: William Hundwasser’s The Nose. “This is the cult book’s cult.”

Wondering why you missed such an exciting cultural event? Perhaps because it never happened. The fictional Flynn performance is merely the jumping-off point for Estrin’s latest novel, The Annotated Nose. A comic story on serious themes, it’s built on a book-within-a-book conceit that may tie modern readers’ brains in knots, but would have seemed perfectly normal to 18th-century readers of Sterne and Diderot. In an age of disposable lit, it’s also an elaborately, expensively designed book, featuring 35 black-and-white illustrations by Montpelier artist Delia Robinson.

In 2002, The Christian Science Monitor called Estrin’s first novel, Insect Dreams: The Half Life of Gregor Samsa, a “new cult classic” and predicted that it would “inspir[e] a companion collection of footnotes and commentary.” While the book was reviewed — and sometimes raved about — from The New York Times to The San Francisco Chronicle to The New Yorker, it failed to turn its author into a household name. Maybe Estrin’s combination of a wildly allusive, erudite style and an unreconstructed 1960s leftist political consciousness simply didn’t fit the times. But it did fit the tastes of editor Fred Ramey, who shepherded Insect Dreams into print while working at mega-corp Penguin Putnam and has since published four more Estrin novels through his independent Colorado-based company, Unbridled Books.

At 69 — he began writing at 58 — Estrin feels a bit like a cult author whose cult has yet to materialize. Thus it seems appropriate that he should write The Annotated Nose, which critiques the very phenomenon of cult novels.

But it’s a bit more complicated than that. In his account of the fictional Flynn performance, Estrin poses as the editor of the book we’re about to read. He tells us the experience inspired him to email The Nose, whose real name is Alexei Pigov. A man who’s lived on the margins all his life, his face hidden by masks, Alexei is both the hero of Hundwasser’s novel and the center of its lucrative multimedia cult (a merchandising triumph involving, among other things, dolls and a Coen brothers film). But he has serious objections to the way Hundwasser portrayed him — so serious, in fact, that he’s prepared an exhaustive series of notes to The Nose, hoping to set the story straight.

Fascinated by “the pain-filled combat of a literary character with his author,” Estrin volunteers to edit The Annotated Nose. This turns out to be a major undertaking, because Alexei doesn’t want his side of the story told in lowly footnotes or endnotes. No, he wants his version of events to confront Hundwasser’s head on: the reprinted cult novel on lefthand pages, the notes on the right.

Hence the unique experience of reading The Annotated Nose. Perusing the left-hand pages, which narrate a freakish and funny coming-of-age tale, one is continually stopped by superscript numbers that lead one over to the other side. For instance, when Hundwasser presents the transcription of The Nose’s interview with NPR’s Terry Gross, Alexei steps in to point out the whole thing is “sheer fabrication.” “Now let me be clear,” he muses, “I would have liked to go on Terry Gross’s show . . . I might even like to go out with her if she seemed open to it . . .”

That’s Alexei Pigov’s tragicomedy in a nutshell. Cursed with a big nose, abandoned by a Gypsy father and neglected by a whorish mother, he uses a succession of masks and assumed identities — ranging from Groucho Marx to Pinocchio to a plague doctor — to hide his unsightly face. A truth seeker in a cynical world, he sees his disguises as reminders of the power of individual expression and protest; his is “a Big White Lie life which might lead us all to freedom.” A lifelong virgin, he also hopes his brand of performance art will help him get girls.

“It actually came from a real situation,” says Estrin of The Annotated Nose, when Seven Days visits him at his home in the Old North End. “My best friend in college was the subject of a cult novel in the ’60s. And there’s been this struggle between the character in this book and its author for the last 50 years.” Another model was a musician friend of Estrin’s “who for 50 years has been trying to get a girlfriend, and his pick-up lines were ridiculous.” (Alexei’s pick-up lines include such winners as “Is it hot in here, or is it just you?” and “I’ll be Beethoven, you be Mozart. Let’s have a conversation.”)

Estrin calls his novel “a straightforward annotated book. People think the book is postmodern or something, but it isn’t.” Postmodern or not, he certainly plays games with the reader — for instance, by putting the book’s illustrator, Delia Robinson, inside the fiction.

In The Nose, Delia is a beautiful dwarf who falls in love with Alexei Pigov. He rejects her because he finds her body as grotesque as his own face. In real life, artist Robinson is average sized. She’s known Estrin since 1964, when “he had driven across the country on a motorcycle with my sister for them to get married in Danby, Vermont,” she recalls. Though the marriage eventually ended, the friendship between the in-laws endured.

Sitting in Estrin’s living room, Robinson says the two of them “have a similar sensibility. And we’re both quite perverse in what we think is funny.” Perhaps some of that perversity went into the fictional version of Delia. Estrin wanted the artist to be a character in The Nose, he says, to justify her inside knowledge of Alexei Pigov. He asked Robinson who she wanted to be. “She said, ‘I’d like to be a dwarf.’ I said, ‘Do you want to be an achondroplastic dwarf or a pituitary dwarf?’ And she said achondroplastic . . . and she said, ‘I’d like to be a nun.’” So Delia became a pint-sized cloistered nun.

While The Annotated Nose is undeniably a funny book, it’s sometimes deadly serious, as when Alexei points out that Americans started worrying about the plague — any and all plagues — after 9/11. Why does the modern world need plague doctors? “The contemporary plague is having to be in someone else’s script,” Estrin says. “Alexei is in Hundwasser’s script. The generalization of that to our lives is, what scripts are we being forced to perform? What characters have been given to us? We are the people who are now bailing out the big corporations and the financiers. ‘Oh, I didn’t realize I was here to do that!’ . . . The question is, why do we believe that’s who we are, instead of looking for more authentic scripts?”

Both Estrin and Robinson speak fondly of editor Fred Ramey, whom they call “Freditor.” “He’s an old-school editor,” Estrin says. “These are people who had dedicated their lives and professions and in many cases their money to nursing American literature.”

But how did he sell Freditor on the idea of a hand-set, illustrated book that retails for nearly $40 in hardcover? “He kept asking me, ‘Can’t we just have endnotes?’” says Estrin. But the author had vivid memories of trying to read the heavily endnoted novel Infinite Jest on a gym treadmill, where flipping pages doesn’t work. “I tried to convince Fred that this was training readers to hold two things in their minds at the same time,” he says with a chuckle. “Someone told me it’s a great book for ADD people.” Ramey eventually gave in, though the book’s unusual side-by-side design created “note clumping” problems that necessitated an “emergency order” for more illustrations to fill empty space. Unbridled is printing 75 copies of a signed collector’s edition with a cover by Robinson, and Estrin says a paperback is also in the works.

“[The price] was a real concern with Marc, that nobody we know could cough up that much money to buy a book,” Robinson says. All the same, she’s already been contacted by one person who coughed up $195 for the collector’s edition — and who presented her with an odd request. “This is your playfulness coming around to bite you,” says Robinson slyly to Estrin. “He said, ‘There’s a space in the back for Alexei Pigov to sign it, and he’s not signed. I would like to know where I can send this book to get this signature.’ Alexei Pigov is a fictional character!”

Indeed, it seems unlikely that The Nose’s fan will ever get his autograph. But in the world of Marc Estrin — who appears masked in his author photo on the book jacket — stranger things have happened.


Here is a link to the book, Rehearsing With The Gods. This is a collection of photographs and essays on the Bread and Puppet Theater. The black and white photographs are by Ron Simon and the essays are by Ron Simon and Marc Estrin, with a foreword by Grace Paley. https://breadandpuppetpress.org/products/rehearsing-with-the-gods



The following is Margot Harrison’s 2012 review of Marc’s ninth novel, When The Gods Come Home To Roost, published by Spuyten Duyvil. https://www.spuytenduyvil.net/


As I was watching American Reunion recently, I was struck by the resemblance between that broad farce about thirtysomethings aching to recapture their glory days and the new Latin-studded, ultra-erudite novel from Burlington’s Marc Estrin.

That’s a slight exaggeration. But at the core of this far more ambitious artwork (a label that probably shouldn’t be applied to anything American Pie related) is the same theme: Aging man chasing youth. Generally in the form of a female decades his junior.

The protagonist of When the Gods Come Home to Roost, Estrin’s ninth novel, is a Berkeley classics professor named George Helmstetter. But his prototype is Faust, the 16th-century academic who, according to literature and lore, made a pact with the devil to regain his youth.

At 64, Estrin’s George has a gorgeous Greek girlfriend in her thirties, yet he finds himself sneaking glances at her teenage daughter. Worse, he’s starting to notice his age. When George is dumped, he faces the terrifying prospect of dating a woman only 14 years his junior.

Thank all the Greek gods that Mephistopheles happens along to rescue our hero from this fate. Because George inhabits the 21st century, Mephisto is a plastic surgeon with radical ideas about rejuvenation. Because this is an Estrin novel, he is named T.J. Eckleburg, after the painted image whose gigantic eyes coldly observe the characters of The Great Gatsby.

This Dr. Eckleburg, however, is no dispassionate judge — rather, he’s an overweening Gatsby himself. And he believes surgeons should give patients the transformations they seek, even if the results are Frankensteinian. “Why shouldn’t we use human powers to explore our human fantasies?” Eckleburg asks a nervous George. “What’s so good about normal?”

Estrin notes in his afterword that Eckleburg was inspired by a 2001 Harper’s Magazine article about Dr. Joseph Rosen, a plastic surgeon at Dartmouth Medical School who’s spoken of (literally) giving patients wings.

That’s fascinating material, fodder for decades of debate. Here’s the problem with Gods: Those issues don’t crystallize — indeed, they barely appear — until George makes his pact with the surgeon at roughly the 180-page mark. And they remain unresolved at the novel’s close, though by then George has done things in the name of his self-fulfillment that could be called downright abhorrent.

Like Goethe, whose Faust is full of satirical detours, Estrin almost seems to have become bored with his plot. But, unlike Goethe, he stretches the preamble to that plot — the rambling soliloquies of blowhard Faust before Mephisto pops up — to ungodly lengths. In Part one, each chapter is followed by an “Intercalarius” (“inserted calendar month,” in Latin) that veers off into a detailed etymology or a musical analysis or a series of emails between characters or an extended allusion.

A few of these tangents advance the plot or deepen its implications, but far too many read like mini-essays on subjects that interested Estrin. Some are brilliant and worthy of anthologizing; still, they slow the novel’s flow. Whenever we are jolted back to the main plot, we’re surprised to be reminded that George — the intellect behind most of these digressions — is about as mature as the American Reunion characters. When rejuvenated George snipes about the stupidity of the high schoolers he hopes to hook up with, he comes off not like a learned professor in a 17-year-old’s body but like a pompous college kid pulling rank on his peers because he can quote Nietzsche.

Estrin is a master of words prone to postmodern digressiveness. But in his best works, such as Golem Song, he maintains focus and brings his conflicts to resolution. Gods feels more like a series of sketches than a finished novel. And that’s unfortunate, because, in an age when face transplants and other radical bodily transformations are within reach, this Faustian story is worth telling.


On May 10, 2007 Mark was interviewed at his home by Phil Trabulsy of Unbridled Books. In the interview he seeks to answer Mr. Trabulsy’s question: "What makes one write these books, and what seems to be their common theme?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toVXuro9klQ&ab_channel=UnbridledBooks




I was fortunate to work with Marc and Donna, publishing three books with Fomite, two of them collections of short stories, the most recent a novel, Answer Only, which appeared this past spring. They stayed true to their mission to return 80 percent of a book’s revenue to its author. Since I don’t live in the United States, I never met either of them in person, but working with them so assiduously online over the years I felt I had gotten to know and trust them. This started back in 2014 with my first Fomite story collection, Off To The Next Wherever, which Marc accepted while I was employed in the Far East of Russia. 


Marc and I emailed back and forth regarding some of the stories in that collection, Marc wanting me to expand a couple of them and present more character development, and also wanting to shorten a couple of them, finding that my inclusion of informational political elements was overlong and unnecessary. He turned out to be correct on both counts. I didn’t fight him on any of them and I think what he liked about my attitude, having worked with professional editors before, is that I didn’t hesitate to thank him and let him know that I appreciated and valued how closely he read my stories and critiqued them, always with a goal to improving and deepening them. I viewed our relationship as a professional one and viewed him as a mentor. I never was made to feel I had to change the way I thought about writing fiction, my approaches, or any of my ideas. Marc knew how to see the intent I was after in anything I submitted to him, and he never once tried to alter or thwart that. What he wanted and hoped for was the best possible expression of that intent.

Since 2014, I have often wondered if he ever sensed how much a boost it was for me to open my email on a frigid dark winter day east of Siberia, with snow on the sidewalks piled over four feet high, and learn that a quiet bearded man in Vermont, along with his wife, wanted to accept me into their family and publish the manuscript I’d sent them. He took a chance on me. I felt a debt of gratitude and with everything I sent him hoped it lived up to some imaginary and rather highly unrealistic expectations.    

Where, I ask myself, did the man find the energy to extend, as Ramey has put it, his activism? As I continued to work with him and Donna, I’d wait my turn for them to get to a book of mine they’d accepted. I’d marvel at the list of accepted and upcoming titles from Fomite, which at the time of his death included approximately 350 titles. It wasn’t as if they had a big office and lots of interns and readers and a paid staff. He and Donna were fully committed to Fomite as a literary endeavor, a labor of love, and if authors were willing to market their work, do readings or interviews, whatever it took to generate sales, then that meant more royalties for them. 

Donna kept all the authors informed, sending out royalty payment listings on a regular basis. It was never about profits first or profits only. They weren’t endowed with grant or foundation money. Fomite was about supporting the authors and literature. To quote from Seven Days, Fomite was about "literary fiction, poetry and 'odd birds,' works that elude classification." 

Marc did many podcasts, too, promoting and discussing his work: https://marcestrin.com/Podcast/Podcast.html

Here below is a sampling of links to Marc’s work that you might enjoy. More can be found online.

https://www.theragblog.com/marc-estrin-the-revolutionary-messages-of-classical-music/


https://www.theragblog.com/marc-estrin-light-unto-the-nations/


https://www.theragblog.com/marc-estrin-up-up-and-away/

https://www.theragblog.com/marc-estrin-georges-messiah/




https://brooklynrail.org/2008/12/books/marc-estrin-with-ben-mirov/





https://marcestrin.blogspot.com/2011/09/i-bet-you-dont-know-what-fomite-is.html


https://www.theragblog.com/marc-estrin-gwot-love/















Friday, September 12, 2025

What Looks Like What Is, A Basil Rosa Story, and Gentian, An Essay, Both Published in Blood + Honey



A heartfelt thank you to fiction editors Jacki Hyatt and Cristiano Cardone, and particularly to Editor-In-Chief, David Estringel for including the Basil Rosa short story, What Looks Like What Is in the September 2025 issue of Blood + Honey. This link will take you to it: https://www.bloodhoneylit.com/fiction/what-looks-like-what-is

David Estringel also included the Basil Rosa creative nonfiction piece, Gentian, in this same issue. You can find Gentian here: https://www.bloodhoneylit.com/cnf/gentian 

Gentian appeared earlier in the year in Issue #4, June 2025, of The Argyle: https://www.theargylelitmag.com/nonfiction/gentian

Here, too, is a link to the Blood + Honey home page: https://www.bloodhoneylit.com/blood-honey-home-page

Visit David's website here: www.davidaestringel.com He's also on X, and Instagram.

David has written and/or published seven poetry/hybrid collections which include, Indelible Fingerprints (Alien Buddha Press, 2019), Blood Honey (Anxiety Press, 2022), Cold Comfort House (Anxiety Press, 2022), little punctures (Really Serious Literature, 2023), Blind Turns in the Kitchen Sink (Anxiety Press, 2023), Brujeria (Alien Buddha Press, 2025), and Down the Bermuda Highway (Alien Buddha Press, 2025). 

He has also written six poetry chapbooks: Punctures (Really Serious Literature, 2019), PeripherieS (The B’K, 2020), Eating Pears on the Rooftop (Finishing Line Press, 2022), Golden Calves (Back Room Poetry, 2023), Sour Grapes (Two Key Customs, 2023), and Blue (Back Room Poetry, 2023). 

David's first co-authored novel Escaping Emily was released by Thirty West Publishing House in June 2024.

His screenwriting includes awards for his projects, "Roadkill," and "Brujo."







Friday, September 5, 2025

Shavian, Or What Makes A Beard A Bard -- On George Bernard Shaw

 Without art, the crudeness of reality would make the world unbearable.

George Bernard Shaw

There's plenty to be found on the internet for students of literature interested in learning more about George Bernard Shaw, though for completeness of scholarship and detail, I recommend Michael Holroyd's comprehensive biography published originally in three separate volumes by Random House. 


Volume One The Search for Love 1856-1898 appeared in 1988. 


Volume Two The Pursuit of Power 1898-1918 in 1989.




Volume Three The Lure of Fantasy 1918-1951 in 1991. 

Mr. Holroyd has condensed his trilogy into a single "definitive" volume. I'm in awe of the time, energy, patience and dedication and research that must have gone into this work.  


For those seeking briefer more introductory pages to Shaw, here are links. 

To learn five things you never knew about Shaw, visit The National Gallery Of Ireland: https://www.nationalgallery.ie/art-and-artists/exhibitions/shaw-and-gallery-priceless-education/five-things-about-GBS

For all the information you'd need to visit Shaw's house, known as Shaw's Corner, situated in Ayot St. Lawrence and maintained as part of England's National Trust:  https://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/visit/essex-bedfordshire-hertfordshire/shaws-corner

Seema Anand Chopra’s unpretentious Timeless Trails blog. Seema offers a room by room tour od Shaw's Corner and focuses with charming enthusiasm on the author's interest in India, his practice as a vegetarian, and his friendship with Mohandas Gandhi.  https://www.timelesstrails.in/2022/10/10/part-3-george-bernard-shaw-from-nobel-prize-to-oscar-award/


I took the photo above from the back of the house. 


Here above is a view extending directly behind the house, of Shaw's garden. Though it can't be seen in this photo, Shaw's garden includes, just as it did in his lifetime, an orchard for apples, plums and pears. National Trust gardeners harvest the fruit and sell it. All proceeds go back into the Trust.  



Front view of Shaw's writing hut, facing away from the house. Still on premises, furnished as it was in his lifetime, the hut was built to turn on a spindle to allow Shaw sunlight from certain directions while writing any time of day. This is where his creative work was alleged to have been accomplished. He used the study inside his house for administrative tasks.


A side view of the hut. Note the elevation at the hut's base, allowing the spindle fuction and the hut to rotate. Note, too, how small the whole structure is.


Above, the hut's interior, his typewriter, all furnishings original. Below,  Shaw's spectacles on the desk in his hut.


To get to Shaw's house in Ayot St. Lawrence without a car, my wife and I needed to ride a bus that originates at Heathrow Airport and passes through Watford where we picked it up and rode to St. Albans, where we got off. From there on the St. Albans High Street, we caught a second bus to the village of Wheatstable. From there, we walked just under 3 miles one way following one of a few trails that crosses scenic pastures and rolling dells and also follows alongside the River Lea. https://wheathampstead-pc.gov.uk/the-river-lea/


Even without an OS map, or an All Trails subscription app on our phones, we were able to navigate the walk based on directions provided by the Natonal Trust website. A long vigorous walk Shaw allegedly enjoyed daily. 


We did, however, take a couple of wrong turns, getting lost but benefitting from the kindness of other hikers, two of whom were also lost but heading toward a different destiantion. 



During his lifetime, a train that ran from a depot in Wheathampstead allowrf him easy access to London. What's left of the depot, seen below, acted as our starting point.










Shaw might have approved of our persistence, chatting it up with friendly strangers on the trail, as much as we approved of the weather and the views of the Hertfordshire countryside. 

What intrigues me about Shaw is how much of his own eccentric man he was, a noncomformist, a lightning rod, a champagne socialist and an eye witness to the end of the 19th and a sizeable piece of the 20th Century. Born on July 26, 1856 in Dublin, Ireland, he died on November 2, 1950 at his home in Ayot St. Lawrence. He was 94 years old. 


He remains as a literary and political figure something akin to Marmite in that he's either loved or hated. My wife and I watched recently in London's West End, Imelda Staunton and her daughter, Bessie Carter, play the lead roles in Shaw's play, Mrs. Warren's Profession. 


Despite Shaw's ability to polarize as artist, judging by the reception to Ms. Staunton's and Carter's performances, respectively, in a wonderful production, Shaw's ideas, use of language, and sense of the dramatic still remain fresh and relevant today. Though no doubt some of the original play was edited for the sake of brevity, just as the works of Shakespeare often are.

In my opinion, it's not his literary works, but the man's politics that detractors take issue with. I'm with them, believing their skepticism warranted. Shaw advocated quite loudly for eugenics, Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini. 

To learn more about Shaw in this regard, I recommend Fintan O'Toole's 2017 book, Judging Shaw.  
Here's a link to a lecture he presented at Columbia University in 2018: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bW9WB-QPDo&ab_channel=SOFHeyman


Pictured to the right is the 40-letter phonetic Shavian Alphabet. Such a work requires an overbearing amount of monomania, but according to scholars, Shaw had beneficent intentions. He believed the English alphabet thwarted literacy and the upward mobility of the poor. He even established in his will a pair of Alphabet Trusts. One meant for research and the gathering of statistics to demonstrate how the Shavian Alphant could conserve labour, money and time. The other to manage publicity and the transliteration of his Shavian Alphabet version of the Androcles and the Lion fable. 

In February of 1957, the British Courts ruled against Shaw's will, though an out-of-court settlement allocated £8,300 to the Alphabet Trusts, and Androcles and the Lion was reproduced in the Shavian alphabet and distributed to public libraries in the United Kingdom and to national libraries abroad. Shaw’s supporters continued to promote the Shavian alphabet, but it's never been applied anywhere else.

Shaw's industriousness deserves to be lauded. He took jobs as a ghost writer for a musical column in the weekly satirical publication The Hornet. He wrote a column for The Star under the name, Corno di Bassetto. Writing as G.B.S. he penned reviews as an art critic for The World, and as a theatre critic for The Saturday Review. He even worked for the Edison Telephone Company.

At the start of his career, he struggled to publish his novels. Undeterred, he eventually published five of them, none of which were a success. 

For one year, from 1886 to 87, his friend Annie Besant, pictured below, serialized his novel The Irrational Knot in her publication, Our Corner. The novel as a whole wasn't published until 1905. 



When in 1881 he was afflicted with smallpox, needing months to recover and choosing to grow his signature beard as a method for concealing his facial scars, he began a novel Cashel Byron’s Profession. The story of a prize-fighter, it garnered no commercial interest or critical praise. 



He advocated for women's rights and gender equality despite indulging in affairs with married women and widows. The details of these affairs can be found in his letters, notably to the actresses Mrs. Patrick Campbell, and Ellen Terry. Jerome Kilty's play, Dear Liar, uses Shaw's letters to Mrs. Patrick Campbell, and hers to him, telling of the zealous romanticism between these two intensely theatrical personalities. 



When he finally married on June 1, 1898, it was to Charlotte Payne-Townshend. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlotte_Payne-Townshend
In 1906, the couple moved into Shaw's Corner. 


Note the body language in the photo above. Shaw was 42 when he married, and Payne-Townshend only six months younger. Some scholars argue their political activism and their interest in literary accomplishments, rather than sexual appetites and physical attaction, kept them together. I've little passion for such hair-splitting. As I view it, rightly or wrongly, Charlotte Payne-Townshend was a philantthropist and scholar, choosing to become Shaw's wife and most likely his secretary following the social demands and rigors of that time. She wasn't his muse and literary biographers may be correct in their assumptions that she most likely was never his wild lover. 

Shaw himself, no doubt, wasn't an always faithful husband. This should be noted for those inclined to canonize the man. Their marriage, however, lasted until their deaths. For me, as friends to the poor and wretched who lived in quite bourgeois and splendid comfort, they epitomize what some label as practitioners of champagne socialism. 


Nonetheless, by all accounts, he was a gifted writer, and she a remarkable woman. Over the years, finally, as someone more than just Mrs. Shaw, Charlotte Payne-Townshend has garnered some deserved attention. These links provide information about past performances of the one-woman play, Mrs. Shaw Herself.

https://www.whtimes.co.uk/news/22469819.new-play-reveals-one-welwyn-hatfields-hidden-characters/


Devised by Helen Tierney and Alexis Leighton (Helix Productions), Mrs Shaw Herself was refined in production from their initial script through a series of early performances before premiering its final version at The Tristan Bates Theatre, London on 21 January 2018. This production was co-sponsored by the Shaw Society. The play has been performed in adapted versions for other venues, including a substantially shorter one for performance online. The text was drawn from letters and diary entries.



Charlotte Payne-Townshend translated Eugène Brieux's play Maternité, and it was peformed by the Stage Society in 1910 at Daly's Theatre in London. 


As Shaw's tireless supporter, acting as his secretary and manager, it must be remembered that in his lifetime Shaw wrote 60 plays, not to mention his political essays and polemics, his theatre, music and art reviews, and the Prefaces to his plays, which I still find delightful reading. Which author can accomplish so much work without some form of consistent support? Few, I believe, if any.

The quotation below from author Elizabeth Gaskell sheds some light on Charlotte's personality.




In short, I suppose we can say that the woman was unselfish. An outspoken defender of women’s rights and fairer treatment of the working class, the wealthy Ireland-born Payne-Townshend became a member, along with Shaw, of the Fabian Society, founded in 1884. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabian_Society

Having already served on the London City Council, Shaw drafted the Society's first manifesto. Generally speaking, the Fabian Society worked to guide Britain into a socialist future. 


Here is a link to a recent discussion  about The Fabian Societyhosted by Alex Phillips on the right-leaning British TalkTV show. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6TKF94tEaI&ab_channel=TalkTV
Journalist Joseph Robertson, interviewed in the discussion, describes The Fabian Society as a "gradualist movement" toward "incremental socialism" in Britain. The current prime minister, Keir Starmer, the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, former prime minister Tony Blair, practically all of Britain's Labor Party are members. They advocate for open borders, the destruction of capitalism without the bloodshed of a revolution, and as Joseph Robertson states, "Marxists love nothing more than beheading a king." 

Would Shaw be happy to view the often charmless, chaotically littered, balkanized and disfunctional Muslim-centric city streets of London, Bradford and Birmingham, to name a few, that this island of strangers Britain has become? I don't know. 

I'm sure, however, he'd be pleased to see so many socialists in positions of power. After all, he was also involved in the 1893 foundation of the Independent Labour Party. 

It's safe to label him a political acitivist. As his popularity as a speaker continued to grow, he started to write what he called his “missionary books.” These included The Perfect Wagnerite in 1898. Prior to that, The Quintessence of Ibsenism in 1891. 


For more on Henrik Ibsen, pictured above, this link is an appealing place to start: https://www.factsnippet.com/site/facts-about-henrik-ibsen.html

Turning away from politics to theatre, I want to place Shaw side by side with Ibsen. This was how his work was introduced me. It's not difficult to find the roots of a Western theatre of realism that's till with us today. A theatre that isn't afraid of challenging social and cultural norms and taboos. Drama, as such, that doesn't seek to please or provide escape. This kind of theatre allows for criticsm and attacks on the status quo. This is why I think Shaw would despise wokeness, for example. Or that horrid state of misery known as cancellation culture. Shaw was intent on slaying all beasts, cutting them down to size. Work culture in any form is not. 

Realism isn't as popular, say, as it was during the angry young man period of the sixties. This is to be expected. Theatre everywhere will support and reflect trends and moods. Though a three-act play isn't as expensive to mount as a musical or a fantasy, it's often less profitable financially.  

As a genre, it has legs, so to speak. A section of he theatre-going public returns to it, and I include myself in this group, as if in need of refreshing their sense of a moral and social conscience. Theatre of this kind cleanses one of grudges held too long. It's cathartic on more than a merely emotional level. I'd argue that we need this now more than ever. Not on the stage alone, but in its progeny, the long-form subscription-based film narratives that are streamed into homes daily via, say, Netflix, across the developed world. 


Shaw embraced elements of what we might coin "pop culture" today. When not reviewing plays or declaiming as an art critic, he penned columns about music, specifically from 1888 to 1894. He raved about Elgar, and promoted Puccini, Mascagni, and Wagner. Nor did he shy away from cinema. What I like about him is that it appears he was always looking ahead. Those who do this, though they may be critical, abide by hope.

Note below the large wooden record player next to the fireplace in the Shaw's dining room.


Note the radio below in the corner between the large window and the record player.



 And the books! Original volumes are on diplay at the house.









Below are some photos of the study at Shaw's Corner, where both husband and wife spent many hours steeped in toil. According to the National Trust, everything in the study belonged to and was used by Shaw and his wife. 


   






Above, his study desk and typewriter.


Above, Shaw's tool box affixed to the wall in his study. Below, his metamorphic library step ladder in the Arts and Crafts style, his leather travel bag on top of it.


Shaw could not have been an easy man to live with. It's a gross understatement to say he had strong opinions and no fear of presnting them. We owe a debt of gratitude to one friend, William Morris, pictured below in a portrait on the wall in Shaw's study. Morris, another socialist, a novelist and an aritst with a unique visual style, was a talent and confidante Shaw wisely chose to heed when he suggested that he try writing plays rather than novels. 







Thus, Widowers’ Houses, his first play, was performed twice in 1892. However, Mrs Warren’s Profession, completed in 1892, his third play, grew in popularity through privately held performances. These were private due to censorhsip regarding any play concerned with prostitution. The play didn't see a public stage until 1925. Responding to this, Shaw stated in an 1897 interview: "My reputation as a dramatist grows with every play of mine that is not performed." 

This list ranks the plays. Please don't think you must agree with the rankings. I certainly don't. https://www.famousfix.com/list/plays-by-george-bernard-shaw

Getting back to his vegetarianism, to understand better how Shaw defined it, one can consult Alice Laden and R. J. Minney's 1972 The George Bernard Shaw Vegetarian Cookbook

The man died at the age of 90, a vegetarian for 66 years, openly critical of vivisection, and any form of cruelty in sport. https://ivu.org/history/shaw/ I doubt he'd support MMA.

To learn more about his views on socialism, here's a link to his 1926 essay on the subject: https://www.britannica.com/topic/George-Bernard-Shaw-on-socialism-1985101 I don't doubt he'd support the young Ugandan socialist currently running as a Democrat for mayor of New York City. 

All of which leads me to this. In my opinion, Shaw doesn't fit into today's narrower more homogenized and globablized political framework. For example, he was by all accounts an anti-vaxer. He would have probably despised the shutting down of the world economy during Covid. He was a rabidly independent thinker, and yet he supported forms of socialism that call for more stringent government control in any society. As I've already written, he supported the likes of Hitler and Mussolini. Though I admire and enjoy his plays, his politics make no sense to me. Naturally, I must view them through the prism of his era. But how can he love and pity and champion the working man while saying in an interview that the biggest problem with the United States is its Constituition. Anyone with any knowledge of Western-style democracy would find that the Bill of Rights in the American Constitution allows for priviledges that no socialist or communist government has ever supported. 



His bed, above. His dresser, below. Hard to imagine him sleeping much.



The activism and the politics, in particular, are where I find far too many contradictions and foms of hypocrisy in Shaw. As I do in any bureacratic administative-centered top-down approaches to governance. The State exists to look after itself. It's no surprise that primarily the young throw themselves at it. They're in search of new parents and a utopia. They haven't yet seen the bait and switch that The State, despotic sheep or tortoise in wolf's clothing -- and not unlike the symbol of The Fabian Society -- is capable of becoming. 
   
Along with documentaries and critical assessments, there are a handful of short original videos on You Tube in which Shaw is interviewed. These are from British Movietone, British Pathe, and the British Film Institute. Here's a link to the BFI tribute:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BN6n-Sfc5_U&list=PLRyr3thLd7H40Pcpv_LsZIMeS3EpcfcaP&index=15&ab_channel=BFI

This next one is from August 26, 1929, filmed in the garden at Shaw's Corner. He speaks about his first visit to America: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEESoO7cN_g&list=PLRyr3thLd7H40Pcpv_LsZIMeS3EpcfcaP&index=14&ab_channel=BritishMovietone

Watching these, and others, I find again that Shaw's politics aren't much different from the muddle-headed approaches seen coming from the Left today. Coming from the Right, Shaw displays a knack for the theatrical. Naturally, he's a champion of the worker. As long, of course, the worker stays in his lane and knows his lowly place. Though he strives, how he strives, this glorious worker. All this nonsense becomes apparent rather quickly. In one of the videos, he makes his disdain clear regarding the American Constitution, a document, as I've mentioned, he had no use for. 

I'm done with his politics. I prefer discussing his awards. Below, on the mantle in his drawing room, as if to represent the old world, stands a porcelain figurine of the Bard of Avon, one of his heroes. Next to it, as if to represent the new world, stands his Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay earned in 1938 for the film version of Pygmalion starring Wendy Hiller, and Leslie Howard. 






I don't know which one is the best. I'll leave that for you to decide. I like them all for different reasons. 

I'm also fond of the film versions of Arms and the Man, Caesar and Cleopatra, Saint Joan, and Major Barbara. I believe all of these can be found on You Tube.




Visitors to Shaw's Corner will find upstairs just outside of Shaw's bedroom, his other significant award, the 1925 Nobel Prize for Literature. It's encased in glass, which explains the blurriness of my photo above. 

The Nobel Prize Committee recognized Shaw "for his work which is marked by both idealism and humanity, its stimulating satire often being infused with a singular poetic beauty."

Shaw declined the prestigious award, and for this act of selflessness I must give him credit. He took a jab at Alfred Nobel, the inventor of dynamite, saying, “I can forgive Nobel for inventing dynamite, but only a fiend in human form could have invented the Nobel Prize." 

According to a periodical known as The Week, he also stated regarind the award, "It's perfect nonsense! To offer me an award of this sort is an insult, as if they had never heard of me before — and it's very likely they never had." 

After a controversial brouhaha which was more likely a tempest in a teapot, Shaw chose to accept the award itself, but not the prize money. His recommendation was that the sum be used to fund translations into English of works by Swedish playwright August Strindberg.

For a long time, from 1925 to 2016, Shaw held the sole honor of being the only invidividaul to receive the Nobel, and the Oscar prizes. Bob Dylan, in 2016, was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature. He had previously won an Oscar in 2001 for Best Original Song, "Things Have Changed" featured in the Michael Douglas vehicle, The Wonder Boys

I know I'll make a few enemies with this comment, but, sorry, this I can't comprehend. It's a reminder of why I dislike awards of any kind. Popularity contests, if you will. Marketing campaigns. I've never even heard this Bob Dylan song allegedly deserving of an Oscar. And Dylan getting the Nobel Prize for literature is astounding when the likes of Vladimir Nabokov, nominated ten times, never recieved one. Nor James Joyce, Jorge Luis Borges, Anton Chekov, and Henrik Ibsen. I could rant on all day about this, but I'll spare you.

Here's a link to an interesting artcile that shows I'm not the only one to find how remarkably baffling and distressing this is for those who care about how literature is perceived and promoted.  https://eyeoflynx.wordpress.com/2014/03/05/great-authors-who-didnt-win-a-nobel-prize-for-unlikely-reasons/  

The article's list, by the way, starts with non-recipient Tolstoy and includes George Orwell, and W.S. Maugham. Three of my all time favorite writers. 

So, as I tell myslef, I tell all you writers and justice warriors out there, be warned, don't do anything for accolades or to change the world. There's no justice, no utopia, and the world will change itself with or without your assitance and demands. There's only you and either your rejection of or your willingness to make Faustian bargains with the machine. Or, as in the case of Robert Zimmerman from Minnesota, to take the name of a Welch poet, to convince the world you're important while you sing horribly, and clearly fashion some clever lyrics, though all the while pretend you're Woody Guthrie, some kind of real deal, and with each million earned, each wing added to one of your mansions in California or the South of France, to more or less become the machine while posing as its harshest critic. 

Sad, really, because I kind-of-sort-of liked a few Bob Dylan songs way back when. I can't stand him now. With Shaw, I have many of the same reservations, but somehow the works of Shaw, outside of his dubious politics, have found a way to revive themselves in me. Perhaps this will happen with Bob Dylan. Who knows? Only time will tell. Not that anyone is holding their breath. 






A Suitable Match, a new Basil Rosa story featured in The Bloomin' Onion

             Too cruel is life to those aged beyond their years. A sincere and humble thank you to editors Daniel Groves, and Leah Harter at...